||Doctor of Clinical Practice
||Doctorate in Clinical Practice
Reference should be made to the University's General Regulations found in Section IV and Section V (Higher Degree Regulations) of the University Calendar.
Except where an opt-out has been granted by the University (see below) the following academic regulations apply in addition to the General Regulations.
|Candidates must be able to satisfy the Regulations for Admission as specified by the University and Faculty. In addition:
Accreditation of Prior Learning (APL)
- The normal requirement for entry to the course will be a relevant first degree or professional qualification at an equivalent level in an appropriate discipline or a higher degree in a health or social care related subject. Acceptance will be at the discretion of the Head of Faculty. Candidates whose first language is not English are required to satisfy the University’s admissions requirements for English Language.
- The minimum classification normally expected for a degree entrant is 2:1. However, candidates with a 2:2 will be considered if they can demonstrate their commitment to the programme and potential for successful completion. Other appropriate qualifications might include, for example, a diploma in nursing, midwifery, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, medicine, podiatry or psychology. Candidates without a good first degree are expected to demonstrate evidence of advanced studies, a relevant professional qualification at a suitable level.
- All candidates must satisfy the Programme Leader that they are competent to pursue the programme. Candidates must also be approved by the Director of Education in the relevant Faculty. They reserve the right to refuse permission. In certain circumstances it may not be possible to accept a student if appropriate research supervision in their area of interest cannot be provided.
- All candidates must normally have a minimum of three years post-qualifying professional experience. Part-time students are expected to be working in their clinical speciality, and full-time students will be required to have negotiated a clinical internship with a relevant health/social care organisation.
- Prospective candidates are required to complete an application form indicating their reasons for wishing to enrol and outlining their proposed research project. The names of two referees who can comment on their academic ability and clinical experience are requested. Part-time students in clinical practice are required to submit a letter of recommendation and support from their managers. Applicants are interviewed prior to acceptance. Overseas candidates are normally interviewed by telephone.
- Students enrolled on relevant MSc programmes in the University may be eligible to transfer to the Doctor of Clinical Practice programme prior to undertaking their research/clinical practice project.
- Candidates may register for one of the following:
- Doctorate in Clinical Practice
- Individual module(s)
- The Doctorate in Clinical Practice is a programme run by two Faculty’s in the University of Southampton. For the taught component of the programme, candidates from the Faculty’s are taught together. Candidates will register with the Faculty in which their research supervision is based for the duration of their registration. In the case of joint supervision, candidates will register in the Faculty where their first supervisor is based.
APEL/APCL will be considered on a case by case basis in accordance with the University regulations for APL.
Candidates may apply for exemption from up to 180 credits of taught modules on the basis of prior certificated learning (APCL) at Masters (M7) or Doctorate (M8) level. The acceptance of such credit towards the award of a qualification shall be at the discretion of the Programme Leader. No application for APCL may be made towards the dissertation. Each case is examined on its own merits.
A maximum mark of 50% will be awarded for successful Accreditation of Prior Experiential Learning (APEL) and Accreditation of Prior Certified Learning (APCL) claims. Such claims will be clearly identified on candidates' transcripts to ensure that the mark is not included in any overall averaging of marks.
||Structure of Programme(s)
|The programme shall contain a combination of clinically (or professionally) focused research leading to submission of a written thesis, and a modular taught component comprising core and optional modules.
The programme shall be undertaken over a period of not less than three years of full-time, and four years of part-time, study. The maximum duration of candidature is four years for full-time and seven years part-time. The period ends when the thesis is submitted. These periods of registration will not incorporate periods of suspension of studies.
Candidates may apply to suspend from the programme temporarily for a specified period which will not normally exceed twelve months. Save in exceptional circumstances, permission to suspend will only be granted where the candidate can still complete the programme within the time limit defined by the regulations.
The research component of the programme is continuous throughout the period of registration.
The taught component will normally be completed within the first two years for full-time students and within four years for part-time students. A candidate who fails to complete coursework, examination requirements or the thesis by the date specified, or within the maximum period allowed for the programme, will be deemed to have failed the programme.
The programme structure is as follows:
The programme may include lectures, seminars, tutorials, practical work, coursework, contract learning, projects as specified for individual modules, and research. Candidates will select their optional modules in consultation with, and with the approval of, the Programme Leader.
- Four core modules (40 credits at M7 and 100 credits at M8)
- Two optional modules (40 credits at M7)
- Research thesis (360 credits at M8 level)
The Faculty reserves the right to postpone optional modules if insufficient numbers of students are registered. Students will therefore be required to choose their preferred options and also indicate their second choice. When optional modules are over-subscribed, the Faculty will reserve the right to offer students their second choice modules.
Academic staff within the Faculty of Health Sciences and the Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, and other staff approved for this purpose, will supervise studentsí research projects. The Programme Leader will manage the appointment of supervisors.
|Research Supervision and Progress
Students will be assigned two research supervisors within a supervisory team who will be responsible for the supervision of the candidate's research project and for providing academic advice to the candidate; they will report on the candidate's work and progress when requested to do so.
The University of Southampton may, at any time, review the progress of an individual candidate. If this is unsatisfactory and if, after due warning, there is insufficient improvement, the Board may recommend termination of candidature to Senate.
Students will undergo an Interim Assessment at least six months before submission of the thesis and normally no later than 36 months after registration for full-time and five years for part-time students. The assessment will take the form of an oral examination based on a written report of no more than 10,000 words on progress to date.
An internal examiner who meets Faculty criteria for the examination of doctoral theses, but has no supervisory responsibility for the student, will be appointed to conduct the Interim Assessment. Following the assessment, the examiner may recommend that the candidate:
The recommendation should be supported by the supervisor(s). If the recommendation is not supported by the supervisor(s), the matter will be referred to the Award/Programme Leader for a final decision. If the recommendation of the examiner, supported by the student's research supervisor(s), is that continuation to submission of a doctoral thesis is not supported, a clear written statement of the reasons will be provided to the student with guidance on ways in which he/she might reach the required standard, and a date when the recommendation might be reviewed. Only one such review will be permitted.
- may proceed to submission of a doctoral thesis;
- may not proceed to submission of a doctoral thesis but may be permitted to undergo a further Interim Assessment on one subsequent occasion;
- may not proceed to submission of a doctoral thesis but may be permitted to complete a smaller-scale research project compatible with the award of the MSc in Clinical Practice.
Examination and Submission of Thesis
A candidate who is about to submit a thesis shall give at least two months' notice in writing to the PGR Officer which shall include the full title of the thesis. Such notice of intention to submit a thesis shall be given no later than 31 January if the candidate seeks award of the degree the following July.
Candidates must have successfully completed the taught component of the programme before submission of their thesis.
After the completion of the necessary period of study, a thesis shall be submitted for examination in accordance with the instructions in the booklet Completion of Research Degree Candidature (available through the Faculty Student Office).
On submission of a thesis a candidate shall be required to sign three documents: (a) a form of consent that the thesis, if successful, may be made available for inter-library loan or photocopying from a date stipulated (subject to the law of copyright); (b) a form of consent that the thesis, if successful, will be made available electronically through the University of Southampton Research Repository from a date stipulated (subject to copyright); and (c) a declaration stating that the thesis is the result of work done wholly or mainly while the student was in registered candidature and that, where the thesis is based on work done by a candidate jointly with others, a substantial part is the original work of the candidate.
A thesis may not exceed 50,000 words unless prior permission to exceed this length has been given by the Faculty on the recommendation of the supervisor(s).
Normally there will be one internal and one external academic examiner for each candidate's thesis. A third examiner, normally a senior health care practitioner (academic or non-academic, who may be internal or external to the University) may be appointed to provide additional expertise as appropriate. The supervisors may not be appointed as examiners.
|Taught Component - Moderation of Assessment and Student Progress
An external examiner will be appointed, in accordance with University regulations, to moderate the standard of work submitted for the modular taught component of the programme. Additional external examiners may be appointed to moderate work with a specific clinical focus as required.
The relevant programme leader will give guidance on the taught component of the programme.
For each module, a student is allowed to revise and re-submit a failed piece of work on one occasion only and normally within three months of the notification of failure. In exceptional circumstances, a third attempt may be offered at the discretion of the Board of Examiners. A student who fails a module at the second (exceptionally third) attempt will be deemed to have failed the programme and will have their registration terminated.
Candidates who are registered for, but do not complete, the doctoral programme may be eligible for the award of the MSc in Clinical Practice if they have successfully completed modules amounting to 120 credits and a research dissertation equivalent to 60 credits (15,000 - 20,000 words); or the award of the Postgraduate Diploma in Clinical Practice if they have successfully completed modules amounting to 120 credits.
||Award of Qualification(s)
|Candidates for the degree of Doctorate in Clinical Practice will be required to attend an oral examination.
Examiners for the thesis shall recommend one of the following courses of action:
A candidate who fails to submit corrected coursework or a revised thesis by the date set by the examiners shall normally be regarded as having failed the examination and the recommendations of the examiners shall lapse.
- That the degree of Doctor of Clinical Practice be awarded subject, if necessary, to minor amendments to the thesis being made by a date specified. Minor amendments include: minor omissions of substance, typographical errors, occasional stylistic or grammatical flaws, corrections to references, addition/modification of one or two figures and minor changes to layout and require no new research. They may be certified by the internal examiner only. The date specified for the submission of such minor amendments should normally be no later than a month after the formal notification to the candidate.
- That the degree of Doctor of Clinical Practice by awarded subject to the correction of modest errors/omissions of substance being made by a date specified (the procedure for re-examination of the thesis should be clearly specified in the report). Such amendments may require limited further analysis but will not affect the originality of the central thesis. They will be of a scale to require certification by both the internal and external examiners though normally not so extensive that an oral examination is required. The date specified for the submission of such intermediate amendments should normally be no later than six months after the formal notification to the candidate.
- That the candidate be required to attend for a further oral examination.
- That the candidate be permitted to submit, by a date specified, a revised thesis for the same degree for re-examination on one subsequent occasion. The date specified for submission of the revised thesis should normally be no later than 12 months after the formal notification to the candidate.
- That, in the case of a candidate who has failed to satisfy the examiners, permission be given to the candidate to apply within a specified time for the award of the Postgraduate Diploma in Clinical Practice or MSc in Clinical Practice as appropriate. This may be allowed without re-examination subject to any minor amendment of the thesis which may be required by the examiners, or may be subject to re-examination of a revised thesis.
- That the degree be not awarded and that re-submission of the thesis be not permitted.
Where the examiners recommend that the degree be not awarded and that the re-submission of a revised thesis be not permitted, the candidate may ask for the case to be reviewed in accordance with the procedures laid down by Senate. A copy of the procedures may be obtained from the PGR Officer.
|These regulations may be revised during the student's period of registration in accordance with the procedures approved by Senate.
Students are guided to the Special Considerations guidance in the University Calendar in particular the guidance relating to the deadlines for submission of Special Considerations forms.
The treatment of special considerations is dealt with under separate Special Considerations procedures at http://www.soton.ac.uk/quality/assessment/special_pol.html.
A student's performance may be worthy of special consideration if their performance in a relevant assessment has been adversely affected by exceptional circumstances outside their control and there is evidence to support such a claim.
Special considerations shall only apply to circumstances which can be clearly related to performance in particular elements of assessment.
The authority of the Special Considerations Board to make allowance for exceptional circumstances may be restricted in some programmes subject to Professional, Statutory or Regulatory requirements or because of the special requirements of particular programmes. In such cases, this will be made clear to students in programme documentation.
Fitness to Practice
Students are advised to acquaint themselves with the University Fitness to Practise Policy which is used within the Faculty of Health Sciences.
Where issues of Academic Integrity are detected, the Faculty will follow the published Academic Integrity Regulations. Where a case remains active prior to an examination board, a mark of 0 will be presented to the examinations. This mark will then be amended by Chairs Action depending on the outcome of the Academic Integrity process.
The Faculty is moving to the use of Turnitin software as an educational resource to help students to help evaluate the originality of their own work. Where Turnitin submission is required of work that will contribute to summative assessment and the student fails to submit, they will be awarded a mark of 0 for the component in question.
Students are guided to the Academic Appeals Regulations in the University Calendar. Candidates who do not attend at least 80% of timetabled modular sessions will incur a 10% penalty reduction in their overall modular mark.